Intellectual property and AI

Intellectual Property Challenges in the Age of AI

As AI continues to evolve and integrate into various industries, questions surrounding intellectual property (IP) rights are becoming increasingly complex. Existing IP laws, originally designed for human-created works, are now being tested by AI-generated content, raising uncertainties about ownership, copyright protections, and compliance obligations. Since most IP frameworks have not been tailored to address AI-driven creativity and data processing, businesses must navigate evolving legal landscapes to ensure compliance.

The EU AI Act acknowledges these challenges by introducing regulatory provisions that impact the development, deployment, and use of general-purpose AI models, particularly those that generate text, images, and other creative content. The Act emphasizes the need for AI developers to respect copyright laws, ensure transparency in training data usage, and establish accountability mechanisms that align with existing IP regulations. However, while the AI Act sets a foundation for legal clarity, it is just one component of a broader IP compliance framework that businesses must consider.

Key Considerations for Businesses Using AI Models

The implications of IP compliance differ for providers and deployers of AI systems. Providers are responsible for ensuring that AI models are built on legally sourced data and have clear licensing terms, while deployers must ensure proper use of AI-generated outputs in commercial contexts. Both parties must assess IP risks at each stage—training, input, and output—to maintain compliance with copyright laws and related legal frameworks.

Understanding Your Role Under the AI Act

• Businesses should first determine their classification under the EU AI Act—whether they are a provider, deployer, or other stakeholder.
• Providers, responsible for developing and placing AI models on the market, must ensure compliance with copyright laws, including transparency in training data usage.
• Deployers, or those integrating AI into their operations, need to verify that the AI tools they use adhere to licensing and copyright regulations.

Considerations for Providers of AI Systems

1. Training Data & Copyright Compliance

• Verify Legality: Ensure that the AI model’s training data is sourced legally and that all necessary permissions from copyright holders are in place.
• Transparency & Documentation: Maintain clear records showing how training data was acquired, and provide transparency to users on the sources of data to avoid any IP disputes.

2. Terms of Use & Licensing

• Clear Licensing Terms: Review and clearly communicate the terms under which the AI model’s outputs can be used. Establish whether commercial use is allowed, and outline any licensing or usage restrictions.
• IP Protection: Ensure that all generated outputs are properly licensed and free from copyright claims, protecting both the users and the provider from potential legal issues.

3. AI-Generated Content & Protectability

• Copyright & Ownership: AI providers must clarify the copyright status of AI-generated content. Typically, such content is not eligible for copyright protection unless there is significant human intervention.
• License Granting: If the model's outputs are to be used commercially, providers should include provisions in the licensing agreements that cover ownership or rights to AI-generated content.

Considerations for Deployers of AI Systems

1. Prompts & Input Materials

• Input Compliance: Ensure that the materials (documents, media, etc.) fed into the AI are legally compliant and free from copyright violations. Explicit permissions must be secured if copyrighted content is used.
• Responsible Data Use: Formulate prompts and input data that do not infringe on the intellectual property rights of third parties, helping to mitigate any legal exposure.

2. Commercial Use & Risk Mitigation

• Review Commercial Use Terms: Ensure that the provider's terms allow for commercial use of AI-generated content. Double-check any usage restrictions to avoid potential IP conflicts.
• Risk Management: Assess the IP implications of the generated content, particularly if the AI system is used in creative industries like design, advertising, or marketing.

3. Need for a Robust Review Process

• Internal Oversight: Deployers should have a review process in place to evaluate the legal and ethical implications of AI-generated outputs, especially in high-risk industries. This includes ensuring that AI outputs align with copyright laws and internal policies.
• Training & Awareness: Conduct regular compliance workshops for all relevant teams to address intellectual property concerns related to the deployment of AI systems. This will ensure that staff are aware of their responsibilities when using AI-generated content.

Next Steps for Businesses

• Understand your classification under the EU AI Act (provider, deployer, etc.) and ensure compliance with its requirements.
• Review and document training data sources and ensure transparency in AI model usage as per the Act's guidelines.
• Implement a robust compliance framework to address AI risk categories and ongoing monitoring in line with the EU AI Act.

By embedding copyright due diligence into AI strategies, businesses can harness the power of generative AI while safeguarding intellectual property rights and regulatory compliance.

At Novius Consulting, we guide organizations through the complexities of AI governance, ensuring ethical and legally sound AI adoption strategies. Our team can assist in developing tailored AI compliance frameworks, conducting risk assessments, and providing strategic guidance on AI-related copyright matters.

Contact us to explore how we can support your AI initiatives.

‍